Home > Uncategorized > Mobile Computing Bill Shock: $685? Are you kidding me?

Mobile Computing Bill Shock: $685? Are you kidding me?

This post is slightly off topic, but it does have some connection to my blog topic of trust, and is something I wanted to speak out about.

I recently had the shock of logging into my mobile provider’s website (T-Mobile) to review and pay my most recent statement, and realized that my current bill which is normally in the $100 range had exploded to $685. This after I had recently changed plans and was expecting my bill to be even smaller than it had been recently.

So I got to looking at the details and realized that the majority of the excess amount resulted from a single charge for “roaming data services”. It was at this point that I remembered that I had made a business trip to Winnipeg during that statement period.

I called my provider to inquire about this charge, and learned that I had been charged a premium rate for data services used while roaming, that the unlimited rates for data and SMS included in my service plan do not cover roaming charges, that I should have known this, and they could have helped me avoid these charges if I had called them prior to international travel. Despite various degrees of complaining, railing, and pleading on my part, they are not going to reduce the charge, and I will have to pay it. They did offer to set up a payment plan for the excess charge to be paid over several billing periods (gee, thanks).

Here’s what’s going on

Mobile providers need to engage in capacity planning. Like any service provider they need to be able to operate their networks with some logical relationship between revenue and cost that results in a profitable business. I have no problem with this.

So for mobile operators this means that providing services for roaming subscribers of other mobile operators is a big unknown in their cost model. They know how many subscribers they have on their own network and they have lots of usage data that they can use for capacity planning, in order to arrive at a logical revenue model that drives what they then charge their subscribers. It’s difficult to know how much roaming usage they need to plan for. The solution is to charge a high wholesale rate to a roaming user’s home operator when they provide services to roaming subscribers. The home operator in turn marks up that wholesale rate to arrive at a retail rate charged to their subscriber. Which in my case noted above, resulted in a rate in excess of $10 per Megabyte.

The problem is, it appears to me, that this system has become exploitative and predatory in practice. Instead of being a cost/revenue projection problem, it has clearly now turned into a huge revenue stream for mobile operators.

In my mind there are three key elements that make this an egregiously exploitative and predatory business model: first, the wholesale rates being charged are far in excess of the foreign operator’s actual costs; second, the markup being earned by the home operator is excessive; and third, these rates are being paid without any notification to the subscriber at the time of consumption. Is there any other situation where an individual consumer makes a purchasing decision in the range of hundreds to thousands of dollars without knowing he is making that decision? Not many that I know of.

So the European Union has figured out that this is a problematic practice that needs to be addressed. The European Regulators Group has passed regulation, which goes into effect in early 2010, providing limits on wholesale roaming rates, and requiring notification to subscribers when they first initiate a connection subject to a roaming rate. Glad to see this, and hoping to see North American regulation follow suit.

Meanwhile, I’ve determined how to set my phone to avoid roaming for data services. For anybody interested, on a G1 it is as follows:

Settings -> Wireless Controls -> Mobile Networks -> Data roaming (connect to data services when roaming)

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. vic
    December 14, 2009 at 12:17 am | #1

    This problem is interesting in a larger sense. Early pre-Internet BBSes overcame long distance expenses by strategically placing forwarding lines in geographical locations that crossed rate zones. VOIP helped to break the long distance pricing model. Countless examples exist. Like other industries, the challenge is one of anti-trust practices. There is no real competition in the sale of airtime, so the mark up is phenomenal. I think it is a true American weakness to seek out technical solutions for regulatory problems. The innovation is nice but we ultimately pay to both retool our technology and ultimately pay out what was intended to be cost savings.

  1. No trackbacks yet.